My own cards - Permaments

I become strongly inspired, writing the last post about talents. The inspiration surge led to creation of 5 new cards, one permanent asset for each of the classes. I apologize for lack of pictures to illustrate the cards – I was mostly focused on the pure gameplay part of the design.

Firearms seem to be slightly underpowered, given their limited uses. Marksman adds an additional punch to them. Hopefully we’ll get some more guns in the future expansions, making a fire-arm based deck an interesting option. The name is bluntly stolen from an Arkham Horror’s skill for additional legacy/nostalgic feeling.

Drawing cards is sort of a Seeker thing, and so is investigating. Combining both of them creates the “Astute” asset. Originally the requirement was discovering 2 clues, but it seemed too strong, taking Deduction/Rex’ ability into account. I am bit concerned it’s still too strong, frankly speaking.

Resourceful was inspired by the often present on Rogue cards requirement of succeeding by 2 or more. It can be nicely combines with other available Rogue cards, like Opportunist, Derringer etc., making them even more useful.

Forced Learning builds on two of the Mystic mechanics. First one is obviously drawing one of the special chaos tokens. The less obvious one is the high cost, high reward system. Once again I used a name of an already existing card – Eldritch Horror’s Glamour Spell.

One of the issues with evading enemies is – they stay in game. Designers offer some possibilities to enhance results of a successful evade. Bait and Switch or Close Call allow to temporarily handle non-Elite enemies. Ambush gives you the option to slowly wear down enemies by evading – from turn one! You can damage an enemy to make the task easier for the team fighter or maybe manage some of them on your own (even handier if you’re playing solo). 

Please share your feedback about my cards! Next week I plan to conclude all the base investigators and write some more general thoughts about the difference between them and the Dunwich Legacy investigators.

    

Talent Cards and why they deserve our love

One of the biggest unknowns at this stage of AH:TCG’s lifecycle is – how well will designers handle the character development? Will we be excited, adding new, stronger card to our decks? Will we have interesting choices and dilemmas? Will we feel like the investigators we play are growing in strength as the campaign progresses and they gather experience?

I really like what I have seen in the preview of Blood on the Altar, featuring 2 out of 5 new Talent cards¹. Why? There are few reasons why!

I wouldn't draw a person in glasses for the Keen Eye card...

 The most important aspect of 2 new cards is their “Permanent” keyword. First of all, they do not count against the deck size. Thanks to that, you don’t need to remove a card from your deck in order to add one of them. In fact, they actually INCREASE size of your deck! How is it possible? It’s simple – if you decide to include them, you most probably can remove a level 0 talent card from your deck. I am aware, they do not provide a bonus to the same pair of skills, but still the chances are, you decide to remove the weaker talent from your deck.

This touches fundamental challenge of deck upgrading – many of the level 0 cards are of a great significance to a deck. Exchanging them for a new, high level card might not be a deck improvement at all. There are few ways of dealing with this issue. The easiest solution are higher level versions of a card with the same name (let’s say 0 and 2 level versions of Lucky!). While it works fairly well for some cards and is a way to deal with some of the upgrades, it’s not always the best key (bit more of a detailed explanation has been provided by me here). Another alternative is to replace a card with another one, playing a similar role (let’s say Shotgun instead of Machete).

Finally, the third option is a card with a “Permanent” keyword. The even more ingenious design of the “Talent” cards helps even further to deal with the deck size problem (creating the aforementioned slot). It’s therefore the only upgrade path, which enables you to add new cards with new roles to the deck (in place of the remove 0 level talents).

Bloodletting - a controversial treatment

There are also two minor reasons for me to like the previewed cards. They mitigate chance for a bad luck of a draw, providing you with means of dealing with the scenario from the very first action even if you happen not to get a strong hand. It is even more important in further scenarios (where you can use them) – if you get very unlucky in the first scenario, you can just start the campaign from scratch with minimum wasted time. If it happens in the middle, however, it is very often a strongly negative playing experience.²  

Lastly, they are more than just stronger versions of level 0 talents, they use a new design. Not only it’s fresh, which is good by itself. The new design is also encouraging more of an interesting planning than the 0 level talents do (and, as I've already mentioned, boost a different pair of skills!). Keen Eye encourages you to take advantage of the increased skill value for the entire phase, hence forcing a choice to either fight/investigate 3 times in one turn or waste part of its benefits. Blood Pact has even more of an interesting approach, as adding doom tokens is a very delicate matter (also note how incredibly thematic this card is!).

At the end of the article I’d like to make a prediction. I predict we’ll see higher level versions of signature cards in the far future (around 3^rd campaign cycle or so). Let’s see if I guessed correctly!

¹ The preview uses a bolded word “Talent” to describe them, which suggests it’s a trait, shared by all five of them. However, the Blood Pact card does not have the Talent trait printed on it. It might be just an unfinished version of a card, or maybe the article’s author made a minor mistake.

²I have briefly touched the subject of the luck in the board games in the introduction. The question, whether a sudden loss due to a string of unfortunate random events is a good playing experience in Lovecraftian universe has also been briefly mentioned there (towards the end of the article). It is worth noting, that in a recently published preview of “Investigators of Arkham” FFG designers openly admitted a major difference between purely Lovecraftian view on the world and the Arkham Files setting. In Lovecraft’s work Mythos beings are invincible. The doom is imminent and cannot be stopped by human hands. People, even humanity in general are powerless and meaningless in the cold, uncaring universe. Since it does not make a good background for a cooperative game, that is supposed to be won every now and then, Arkham Files characters are portrayed as willing and able to resist the otherworldly powers to a degree and to repel them at least for time being.

All images are courtesy of cardgamedb.com and fantasyflightgames.com

"Skids" O'toole, the Ex-Con

Some of the Arkham Files investigators are heroes by default. Two of them have been covered in my previous entries. A Librarian easily fits the archetype of an investigator. So does a FBI agent, strong and bold. Some of the characters are just more or less regular people (see: Wendy, Jenny) suddenly confronted with the unnatural threats. Some, however, have an antiheroic feel to them. Skids, the ex-con is clearly one of them. World of Arkham Files is not discriminating, though. If you only have the will and the stomach to face the horrors of the mythos world, you are more than welcome to do so.

Legacy: Skids consistently appears throughout the Arkham Files series, albeit it’s the first time he made his appearance so quickly – in the base set already. It was bit of a disappointment to see his very original ability (basically his signature ability) replaced. In every Arkham Files game so far he was able to re-roll unfavorable results – ‘1’s in Arkham Horror and Eldritch Horror and all dice with a chosen result in Elder Sign. I guess it wasn’t too easy to come up with a similar idea for AH:TCG, yet it still feels bad. To add an insult the injury, Arkham designers come up with a card “Hard Knocks”, a name that was reserved for Skids’ ability. I have to admit, I was a big fan of his ability and enjoyed playing him, particularly in Eldritch Horror (higher sanity made him very reliable at monster-killing and less fragile to random negative effects).

Except for a high strength value (and THE ability), there wasn’t much of a unified idea of Skids. His mental skills and Stamina/Sanity vary a bit between each of the Mythos-themed game. In Arkham he is a Rogue, which seems to make sense, given his… hmm... profession.

You are not the true Hard Knocks!

Skill Values: Let’s start with the positives. A decent Combat of 3 sets him up quite well for fighting the enemies. With a whooping Agility of 4 he can also attempt to run away from them (and avoid some Encounter Deck cards¹). Intellect of 3 does not cause any troubles, neither, allowing for quite a reasonable investigating – just in case he gets stuck with high shroud locations, I’d still pick 2 copies of “Evidence”, though.

His low Will is a substantial issue, though. There are many Encounter Cards just waiting in the deck to hit him straight into his face. Once he’s frozen by fear, he can spend turn after turn terrified, constantly losing actions and failing the test to recover. Cryptic Chill strips him out of his assets… the list goes on and on.

On top of that, his Combat is lacking a bit. Unlike Roland, he needs to keep committing icons/resources (through Hard Knocks or Physical Training) for Fight tests to have a decent shot against medium-strength opponents, even if wielding a weapon. It makes him not very consistent as the party main fighter. Having high Agility puts another question mark next to his role as a killer. He would be much easier to picture and assign a role, if he had more of a clear profile of either a warrior or an elusive guy. It does not make creating an effective deck easy, neither.

Skids can easily succumb to madness, when faced with unnameable horrors

 

What Will exactly represents might be a matter of a debate. Still for an ex-con, after few years of jail time to have Will lower than his Intellect is sort of strange. Otherwise his stats fit the picture of a witty, stealthy and yet sturdy ex-criminal.  

Strength

Theme 

  

Special abilities: Upon analyzing both Skids and Jenny I have an impression, that Rogue characters are designed with certain versatility in mind. While the cards themselves seem to slightly favor evading the enemies and attacking them from the shadow (which fits an idea of a Rogue character), the investigators are equipped with abilities, which can be used to fuel different playing styles.²

An extra action at cost of 2 resources allows Skids to do exactly what is needed in a given moment. And a Rogue character has the most chances at having spare resources – Burglary and Hot Streak give him good means to gather resources.

On the other hand, it is an ability, which directly requires paying, and quite a step price. An additional action does not guarantee a result, neither – unlike Roland’s ability, generating free clue without a test. Therefore I consider it slightly subpar.

I also really dislike it from the thematic point of view – I am missing the good old Skids so much. On top of it, ability seems to suit Wilson, the Handyman, much better.

I only have some vague ideas, how to reflect his good old ability. I have an even better idea how to make “School of Hard Knocks” a cool signature card (please see below).

Skids’ Elder sign effect, on the other hand, is very strong, allowing to both pass the test and gain 2 resources! It brings even more flavor if you draw it when using Burglary (“Five resources at once! Score!”) or when dealing with encounter deck (“Ha-ha, I turned Cryptic Chill into a profit!”).

Strength

Theme 

Signature cards: At this point you probably are quite convinced I am not a big fan of Skids. Moreover, you’re wondering if it’s only due to his character not fitting my playing style or is it more related to him losing his signature ability along with general design I consider not thematic enough. To be honest with you, I am not sure myself.

His signature card doesn’t help to improve my sentiment, neither. On paper it seems to have some real potential. You can play it and go do things requiring Skids’ attention, despite being engaged with enemies, or even engaging them on the way. You can meanwhile also equip yourself with weapons/resources to fight them next turn.

In practice, however, you rarely benefit from it much more than from Dodge. And it seems to me, even the designers have noticed it’s not strong enough, as the card has 4 skill icons, including two Wild ones. I guess they had seen it committed to a skill test a lot during play-testing. And this is how I usually spend this card – sometimes as an extra Unexpected Courage, sometimes for a whopping 3 skill icons.

I have come with an alternative of my own to On the Lam. Yeah, you guessed it – “School of Hard Knocks”.

Event, cost 0. Play when you’re about to lose a skill check by 2 or more. Pass that skill check, instead. Shuffle “School of Hard Knocks” back to your deck.

Isn’t it nice? Heroic feel of succeeding against all odds, Rogue-ish versatility, appropriate strength… Please let me know your thoughts about it, I am very eager to read your comments!

Skids' story is sad and still his mother's sickness is haunting him even after she died.

  I’ve been bashing Skids’ design for quite a while, so it’s time for a break. I very much like his weakness. The story behind Skids’ life of crime is with us since Arkham Horror. Hence the card directly translating it into game totally makes me feel like I’m playing Skids. Moreover, the card represents the idea of debt perfectly³. Since many of his traits relate to resources (Special ability, and Elder Sign effect), it also adds up to an uniform vision of the character (Just like Roland’s clues and Daisy’s Tomes). 

 

From the game play perspective it is fairly average. Not too crippling, yet definitely not something one can ignore or deal with too easily.

Strength

Theme 

Class/Deckbuilding options: When it comes to the deckbuilding, I have the same reservations as with Skids’ stats. There seems to be slight disconnection between Rogue options (evading, attacking exhausted – hence evaded – enemies) and Guardian brute force approach. However it’s definitely not as prominent as with the skill values, since you can simply make him a very efficient killing machine (using weapons from both classes, Vicious Blows etc.), while also pulling some neat tricks, available for Rogues. You can use Burglary (or, later on Hot Streak) to pay for your weapons, deal huge damage with Backstab (without even needing a weapon!) or use services of Leo to gain great action advantage⁴. His fellow fighters from the Guardian team do not have this option available for them. He can use most of the Guardian upgraded cards (with an exception for of Shotgun), as well.    

The choice of class for Skids is very logical and consistent. There is no question, he fits the Rogue profile. And as he’s been a fighting character in each of the Arkham Files games, a Guardian sub-class was a natural choice.

Strength 

Theme 

I have to make a confession. I went through a lot of effort to try to like Skids. I played the base game campaign multiple times last week to find some bright sides of him. I managed to slightly improve my opinion of him, I still, see him as a subpar character, and possibly a wasted design opportunity.

With his sub-par investigating abilities, Skids is not suited too well for a solo play. In a team it’s good to pair him with someone, who handles most of the investigation. Therefore his natural partners are Seekers.

Skids I miss the most.

 Strength 

Theme 

 All images are courtesy of cardgamedb.com and fantasyflightgames.com

1 Will seems to be the most tested skill by the encounter deck, with the second being Agility. It makes sense – one can easily go through the game without casting  any spells and evading enemies, so game mechanism should force testing these skills to keep them relevant. Great design choice!

2 Further to this – it seems that each of the four classes has “their” skills, with Rogue being more of a jack-of-all-trades class. Even their special skill card has a Wild symbol (Opportunist; other classes have Vicious Blow, Deduction, Fearless and Survival Instinct).

3 Per official ruling, if an investigator resigns without completing their task weakness, they do not suffer its consequences. At first I wasn’t satisfied with this idea. It not only gives an easy way out, but also gives additional benefit to multiplayer games. Player haunted with their weakness can resign shortly before the other one successfully finishes the scenario. However, there is a very good thematic explanation for this design choice (regardless if it was the reason for this decision or not). Resigning simply provides the investigator with time and opportunity to deal with their obligations. They can take care of the debt, or search for the missing sister.

16.02 Addendum 

As per official FAQ released yesterday, this is not true anymore. Resigning causes you to trigger the "end of the game" (hence: fail) effect of the missions. Now, this is going to hurt and sort of renders my above explanation obsolete and/or inaccurate. 

4 It seems, Skids is waiting for Charisma to be an officially released card almost as hard as no one else – this way he can use both Leo and Beat Cop.